<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:dtvmedia="http://participatoryculture.org/RSSModules/dtv/1.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving to the Grid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelanuzis.com/2006/11/22/moving-to-the-grid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelanuzis.com/2006/11/22/moving-to-the-grid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:42:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anuzis</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelanuzis.com/2006/11/22/moving-to-the-grid/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>anuzis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2core.com/blog/2006/11/22/moving-to-the-grid/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>After they make back the initial investment of development\implementation, it seems likely their long term hosting costs will actually be reduced by this model.

First because CPU\RAM\IO resources across each system will be allocated where needed eliminating redundant hardware.

Second, the ability for service to continue automatically even when older systems begin failing also means lower operating costs from having to keep comp-engineers available 24x7.

I don&#039;t know the details of their cost\ROI on implementing this grid, but my guess is it&#039;s an increase in both efficiency and profitability over the previous web hosting model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After they make back the initial investment of development\implementation, it seems likely their long term hosting costs will actually be reduced by this model.</p>
<p>First because CPU\RAM\IO resources across each system will be allocated where needed eliminating redundant hardware.</p>
<p>Second, the ability for service to continue automatically even when older systems begin failing also means lower operating costs from having to keep comp-engineers available 24&#215;7.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know the details of their cost\ROI on implementing this grid, but my guess is it&#8217;s an increase in both efficiency and profitability over the previous web hosting model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelanuzis.com/2006/11/22/moving-to-the-grid/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2core.com/blog/2006/11/22/moving-to-the-grid/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Sounds efficient but is it profitable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds efficient but is it profitable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

